SENIOR staff from the Therapeutic Goods Administration have ducked and dived in a Senate committee hearing after being questioned by Senator Malocolm Roberts on the implications of the US administration delisting about half of the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule because of safety concerns and adverse events.
“In this session, I asked about the system for testing childhood vaccines before authorisation and during use. I asked because the United States FDA has recently de-listed approximately half of their scheduled vaccines due to adverse events (side effects),” said Senator Roberts.
“It was a simple question, yet the answer was “tag-teamed” across the panel of witnesses from the TGA to avoid answering it directly. It is damning that their own Database of Adverse Event Notifications (DAEN) shows numerous adverse events, which the TGA simply ignores.
“Instead, they quote the benefits of vaccines, which have never actually been proven in field trials.
“I have spoken about this before: in comparisons between vaccinated and unvaccinated children, the unvaccinated were healthier. I will return to this line of questioning during the next estimates.”
Senator Roberts said the panel relied on an answer provided to him in Question on Notice 3212, which has neither been published nor provided to him.
In another Senate committee session the senator asked the TGA about the way they test the vaccines they market as “safe and effective” and mandate for children.
“I already knew the answer – I was just trying to get a clear statement so the public could understand just how much of a farce the “testing” process truly is. The representatives danced around the questions, trying to be as confusing as possible.
“The TGA does not actually test vaccines. Instead, they rely on safety and efficacy data provided by the manufacturer. This data is based on the company’s own testing of its own product. If the manufacturer (drug company) says it’s safe, the TGA gives it a stamp of approval.
“Furthermore, we know that drug companies are not using the correct process for testing new vaccines or drugs. The standard should be to test the new product against an inert saline placebo. Instead, they use an existing vaccine or drug as the control.
“This means our vaccines have been tested against products already known to have side effects – and approved as long as the side effects of the new drug are no worse than those of the old one. This is criminal behaviour.
“Peer-reviewed papers have shown that the testing on the COVID-19 vaccines was fraudulent. It’s not good enough for the TGA to claim they review documentation carefully; the Pfizer testing scandal proves they do nothing of the sort.”