Why Is No One Talking About a Stolen Election? Were the 2026 Midterms Legit?
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite the Democrats having the worst candidates in history. Of those noted below, only the Nazi didn’t win (because he was replaced by a man who had kids with his cousin – who won).
Democrats Run a Drunk, a Nazi, a Muslim Bro, and a Disappearing Man – The Worst Candidates Ever
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite the Democrat Senate candidate going missing for two weeks right before the election and then obtaining a million more votes than Kamala did in his home state of Texas.
In the 2024 presidential election, President Donald Trump won Texas with 6,393,597 votes and 56.1% of the statewide vote to Kamala Harris‘s 4,835,250 votes or 42.5% of the vote.
On Tuesday night, James Talarico defeated accomplished and principled Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton.
As of midnight on Wednesday morning, Talarico has 4,880,229 total votes. Talarico has already received more votes than Kamala Harris in 2024!
Ken Paxton trailed Talarico with 3,847,153 votes in the US Senate race. Paxton received about 2.5 million fewer votes than President Trump.
Read the rest of the story, link in the comments.
— The Gateway Pundit (@gatewaypundit) November 4, 2026
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite the Democrat Muslim Brotherhood sympathizer beating the GOP Senate candidate in Michigan, who received more votes this election than any Republican candidate running in Congress or even for governor, for that matter, ever did in the state’s history.
It’s 81 million “votes,” most in history, all over again
— Liz Harrington (@realLizUSA) November 4, 2026
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite a convicted federal fraudster who quit campaigning still being elected to the Texas House.
Let me tell you something absolutely BONKERS from last night’s midterms…
Democrat Ericka Lomick just “won” Texas House District 93 despite being a convicted felon who suspended her campaign months ago.
She pleaded guilty in 2011 to federal charges including mortgage-fraud conspiracy, bank fraud, and money laundering. Her sentence? 63 months in federal prison.
On her candidate paperwork, she checked the box claiming she had not been finally convicted of a felony. After her criminal record surfaced in September, she suspended her campaign and stopped running.
But Texas election deadlines had already passed, so her name remained on the ballot for both the regular general election and the special election.
And voters still elected her by roughly 51–49%.
Here’s the kicker: Under Texas law, a final felony conviction generally makes someone ineligible to hold office unless they’ve been pardoned or had their disabilities released.
Meaning she can’t actually serve. Her “victory” simply creates a vacancy and triggers yet another special election.
A convicted federal fraudster who quit campaigning still got elected to the Texas House.
Let that absolutely sink in.
— Gina Milan (@ginamilan_) November 4, 2026
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite the Iranian mullahs celebrating the results.
Gee thanks Democrats. Even the terrorist know you’ll collapse this country and you cheered for them.
— Brittany Rae (@legitbrittFLA) November 4, 2026
We are told that the results of the 2026 elections are legitimate despite reports of machines adding ballots to the counts.
I served as a poll watcher today and noticed something that struck me as rather odd.
Throughout the evening, I carefully kept a handwritten tally of every voter who cast a ballot. Each time I compared my count with the total displayed on the voting machine, the machine consistently showed one or two more votes than I had recorded.
To eliminate the possibility of an error in my counting, I repeatedly reset my handwritten tally to match the machine’s displayed total and began counting again from that point forward. Yet, at the next comparison, the machine was once again ahead by one or two votes.
This happened repeatedly throughout the evening.
I’m not suggesting I know the reason for the discrepancies, but the consistency certainly caught my attention. I would be interested in understanding why the machine totals repeatedly differed from my firsthand count of voters.— Silenced 🐴🐭 Ms. Information (@C19VaxInjured) November 4, 2026
