WASHINGTON — In the shadowy corridors of power, where accountability goes to die and the architects of national trauma still walk free, a Maryland Democrat just reminded America why the bodies stacked up.
Last week in the hearing room, Anthony Fauci took the Fifth on the color of his own tie. Then the color of the carpet. One hundred and eleven times he refused to answer a single question.
This week, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., stood lockstep with his party and refused to demand accountability for those refusals. Millions of families still mourning. Remdesivir protocols. Banned treatments. The shots. The hospital rules that turned hospitals into killing fields. And instead of demanding answers from the man at the center of it all, Van Hollen reached for the oldest shield in the Democrat playbook: denial, deflection and the Constitution as a get-out-of-jail-free card.
The Gateway Pundit pressed him directly.
“With millions of Americans dead, and families still mourning loved ones lost to Fauci’s protocols, Remdesivir, and the Covid shots why do you—Democrats—continue to defend him instead of demanding accountability?”
Van Hollen’s answer was pure establishment arrogance.
“I don’t accept your premise. I mean—you just—your question was embedded with fraudulent assumptions. So.”
When the conversation turned to the mountain of whistleblower evidence—doctors and nurses who watched patients die under those exact protocols—he cut in.
“Look, uh, I—”
Then, as the point about Remdesivir and the banning of Ivermectin landed, Van Hollen delivered the full party line.
“I know everybody on the Republican side wants to go after Dr. Fauci, right now,” he said. “But we’d be better spending our time focusing investing in Americans’ public health than going on this witch hunt against Dr. Fauci.”
Lindell TV followed up on the diary inconsistencies and the need for accountability.
“I think everybody should be held accountable. And that’s why Dr. Fauci has answered a lot of questions,” Van Hollen said. “But as he pointed out in his testimony the other day, you have a concerted effort to essentially lock him up.”
When pressed that Fauci answered nothing—pleading the Fifth 111 times—Van Hollen declared, “It’s a right under our constitution, and especially important when the chair of the committee has shown that he’s out to get Dr. Fauci.”
And when Gateway noted that a presidential pardon strips Fifth Amendment protection, Van Hollen snapped, “Just take a look at the law. Okay?”
Then, as the Supreme Court precedent was raised, he shot back, “No. The reason his lawyer advised him to take the Fifth was because the pardon is retrospective. Thank you all.”
Let’s correct the record.
Senator Josh Hawley did during the Senate Homeland Security hearing while Fauci was sitting there pleading the Fifth. After Fauci refused even the simplest questions—what color is your tie? What color is the carpet?—Hawley stated:
“Let’s just get one thing straight: you don’t have any rights under the Fifth Amendment because you’ve been pardoned, as you very well know, as the Supreme Court has been clear for a century and more. Brown v. Walker, 1896. ‘When he has been pardoned, he may not stand upon his privilege.’ You know that. Your lawyers sitting behind you, now shifting nervously in their chairs—they know it.”
I asked Fauci basic questions:
What day of the week is it today?
What color tie are you wearing?
What color is the carpet in front of you?
He pled the Fifth and refused to answer every time – though he did look down at the carpet pic.twitter.com/4Jjq1G4tXd
— Josh Hawley (@HawleyMO) July 31, 2026
The core holding of that case is clear: Once a full pardon removes federal criminal jeopardy for the offenses in question, the Fifth Amendment privilege no longer applies to those matters. The pardon covers the period of Fauci’s official conduct under investigation. Van Hollen’s “retrospective” claim does not restore the privilege for questions about that covered period.
On Thursday the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee voted along party lines to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress. Chairman Rand Paul then hand-delivered the criminal referral to both the Attorney General and the U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. The Justice Department confirmed receipt and stated it is reviewing the matter.
It’s official: letters to prosecute Fauci have been hand delivered to @DOJ. pic.twitter.com/d6hrIJRx1Z
— Senator Rand Paul (@SenRandPaul) August 6, 2026
Van Hollen’s defense is not abstract. It comes from the same political side that, according to polling Gateway Pundit reported at the time, showed a majority of Democrats supporting quarantine camps, fines, and even prison terms for the unvaccinated—plus significant support for removing children from parents who refused the shots.
Meanwhile the whistleblowers Gateway Pundit has featured for years described the same nationwide pattern: hospitals administered Remdesivir and moved patients to immediate intubation while banning early treatments including Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Patients were isolated, denied informed consent, and frequently died under those protocols. The identical pattern appeared in military treatment facilities, where data later showed prolific, incentivized use of Remdesivir despite its known toxicity.
These are not fringe claims; they are first-hand accounts from the people who were in the rooms when the protocols were applied.
And the body count that justified those lethal protocols was itself manufactured. As Gateway Pundit reported, in March 2020 the Center for Disease Control and Prevention quietly rewrote the rules for death certificates, without public notice or required oversight, so that COVID could be listed as the cause of death while pre-existing conditions were buried. Analysts later estimated the CDC hyper-inflated COVID deaths by 88 to 94 percent, creating the false emergency that locked in the Remdesivir-intubation regime, silenced every safer alternative, and scared the living daylights out of Americans into getting vaxxed and boosted.
Van Hollen calls demanding answers a “witch hunt.” He lectures about the Constitution while ignoring the Supreme Court language Hawley quoted chapter and verse.
Here is exactly what the contempt charge means.
If the Justice Department pulls the trigger on the Senate’s criminal referral, Anthony Fauci will face a single, stark charge: criminal contempt of Congress. Under federal law — specifically 2 U.S.C. § 192 — any person summoned before a congressional committee who willfully refuses to answer questions pertinent to the inquiry commits a misdemeanor. That is the exact statute now hanging over the former NIAID director after he invoked the Fifth Amendment 111 times.
Sen. Bernie Moreno didn’t hold back when @gatewaypundit asked why Fauci is suddenly taking the Fifth after testifying 200+ times:
“Because he’s a piece of shit.” pic.twitter.com/L5HuD27FHA— Alicia Powe (@aliciapoweshow) July 29, 2026
A conviction carries a mandatory minimum of one month in federal prison and a maximum of twelve months. Courts may also impose a fine ranging from $100 to $1,000 under the original statute — though modern Class A misdemeanor rules allow judges to levy fines as high as $100,000.
Steve Bannon learned it the hard way. In 2022 a federal jury convicted the former Trump adviser on two counts of the same offense for defying a House subpoena. The judge sentenced him to four months behind bars and a $6,500 fine. After exhausting his appeals, Bannon reported to a federal prison in Danbury, Connecticut, in July 2024 and served every day of the term.
Peter Navarro followed the identical path. The former White House trade adviser was convicted on two counts of contempt of Congress, received the same four-month sentence plus a $9,500 fine, and walked into a federal prison in Miami in March 2024 to begin serving his time.
Both men claimed legal privileges. Both lost. Both went to jail.
That is the precedent now sitting on the desk at the Justice Department.
If prosecutors seek an indictment, if a grand jury returns one, and if a federal judge in Washington convicts Fauci on the contempt charge, he will face the same statutory range that put Bannon and Navarro behind bars: one to twelve months in a federal facility.
The referral has already been delivered.
The statute is clear.
The recent sentences are public record.
What remains is whether the Department of Justice will enforce the law against the man who refused to answer a single question under oath.
Ad block users: Some site features may not work correctly while an ad blocker is enabled, because they break scripts and content this website depends on. If you can’t see comments below, for example, please disable your ad blocker.