By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
GERMANS have sent a massive thumbs down to the scandalous escapades of woke globalist politics and the twisted, Orwellian tyranny of authorities who recently jailed a woman for daring to abuse an immigrant rapist online.
The dominant German party at the European Parliament, Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s Social Democrat Party (SPD) was decimated in the recent EU elections as the co-called “far right” party, the Alternative for Deutschland (AfD), rose to become Germany’s second biggest party. They are now in a position to take power at next year’s national elections with the conservative Christian Democrats, who were first in the EU polling .
The so-called centre-right SPD recorded its worst ever result, while their coalition partner the Greens saw their vote halved. AfD campaigned on restricting Germany’s virtual open border that has allowed the country to fill up with migrants, the worst of whom are given “protected species” treatment.
Significantly, the AfD is also opposed to Germany’s support for the Ukrainian regime and wants a diplomatic solution through negotiations with Russia. They are also in favour of taking back certain powers handed over to the EU. Whether or not the Christian Democrats will go this far is another question.
The AfD is the leading part in eastern parts of Germany, no doubt related to the fact that many people there still remember the misery under a communist dictatorship and who are little impressed by the leftist ideology of Brussels and the German SDP-Green-Free Democrats coalition.
Germans and other nationalities in Europe have clearly had enough of this woke EU socialism driven by the ambitious little German EU President Ursula von der Leyen and her globalist banker buddies at the WEF. Von der Leyen is described as “centre-right” but has relentlessly pushed leftist policy, particularly of the green variety.
Her fellow WEF banker boy, French President Emmanuel Macron, also lost heavily in the EU elections, prompting him to call a new parliamentary election following his withering defeat by Marine Le Pen’s so-called far-right National Rally party.
Typical of German woke politics was the case of nine young immigrants who raped a 14-year-old girl in 2020 during the pandemic. They were recently given shockingly lenient sentences by a juveniles court. But it wasn’t only the court’s light sentences that created national outrage, it was also the response of authorities enforcing “anti-hate speech laws” against people who condemned the perpetrators.
Public outrage erupted and angry comments filled social media, which was where the censorship bureaucracy of the German eKarens, acting in accordance with EU anti-racism and xenophobia laws, achieved another perverse victory against online “hate speech”.
The identity of one of the accused group became known after his phone number was circulated on Snapchat. Angered by the news of the case, a 20-year-old woman from Hamburg messaged the number through WhatsApp, calling him a “dishonorable rapist pig” and a “disgusting miscarriage.” “Aren’t you ashamed when you look in the mirror?” she added.
The alleged victim of these comments, most likely under legal advice, complained to police who immediately swung into action to track down the “offender”. Local media has reported that some 140 people are being investigated for daring to express outrage against the rapists and their trial.
The woman was convicted and sentenced to a weekend in prison for her remarks – not a major punishment but certainly more time in jail than eight of the nine rapists. In a court process reminiscent of Soviet and Maoist thought crime trials, the woman apologised for her remarks, saying she acted out of a “reflex” upon hearing the sickening details of the case.
Germany is a particularly bad case of a country where “hate speech” including “holocaust denial” has for decades been increasingly investigated and prosecuted. Britain, Australia and Canada are close behind as the globalist WEF-UN totalitarians seek to shut down speech against their agenda.
Despite DNA and WhatsApp evidence, eight of the nine men convicted walked free with probation only and no time in prison. The ninth was jailed for two years and nine months without parole.
Yes indeed, in the world of woke, globalist politics and law, how dare one be offended and express outrage against a gang of rapists, especially immigrant rapists. That would be racist hate speech and xenophobia, which are being prosecuted as crimes by the global, neo-Marxist/New Left ideologues.
Five of the men had German passports but none had German heritage, and the others were non-citizens. The rapists were identified as a Pole, an Egyptian, a Libyan, a Kuwaiti, an Iranian, an Armenian, an Afghan, a Syrian, and a Montenegrin.
The twisted, Orwellian moral code of this speech and by extension, thought censorship movement decrees that certain groups of people in society should be specially protected, in much the same way environmentalists declare a species of frog or bird “under threat” from those despised classes of “oppressors” who farm livestock or harvest trees for timber.
The “protected species” of humans who initiated this global crusade were “oppressed women”, who launched “women’s liberation” and feminist movements worldwide back in the 70s. Then the male homosexuals and lesbians “came out” and declared “gay liberation”.
Then came the transgender movement, a particularly well protected species, who invented a coalition called LGBTQA+, which campaigns under the protection of the increasingly harsh penalties worked into legislation by the neo-Marxist bureaucracy, as represented in Australia by the anti-discrimination and human rights bureaucracies, and now the online censorship of the Office of the eSafety Commissioner.
Esafety commissioners are seen as necessary by the ruling bureaucratic elites because of the explosive growth of the internet and alternative news sites and forums, many of which have been exposing this globalist operation and resisting centres of power and their narratives.
Australia’s eSafety commissar Julie Inman Grant told a World Economic Forum meeting: “I think we’re going to have to think about recalibrating a whole range of human rights that are playing out online, you know from freedom of speech to freedom from online violence.”
This is the astounding hubris and self-deception of a corporate executive-turned-bureaucrat who presumes to have some sort of power to “recalibrate human rights”. We might well ask: “Who do you mean by ‘we’ white lady?”
This is the same eSafety Commissioner who attempted to prosecute Elon Musk and Canadian man Billboard Chris, who campaigns against transgender surgery on children.
Billboard Chris’s alleged crime was exposing the grossly obscene behaviour of a woman to man transvestite named Teddy Cook, who managed to get him/her self appointed to a World Health Organisation committee writing health care policy for transgender individuals.
Cook, apart from wearing t-shirts with messages like “I want to cum in your heart”, posted images of a dog having sex with a man and posted on social media about bondage and sex with “young age” people under the influence of illicit drugs.
Musk was also a particular target because he bought Twitter from its previous owner Jack Dorsey, who allowed it to fall under the control of a Democrat-run censorship regime that even cancelled Donald Trump’s account, along with thousands of others. In 2014, Inman Grant became Twitter’s director of public policy in Australia and south-east Asia at Twitter and then in 2016 moved into a similar role at Adobe.
In 2017, Inman Grant was appointed Australia’s national eSafety Commissioner, a position established in July 2015 by the Abbot Coalition government under the Enhancing Online Safety for Children Act 2015.
How ironic that Inman Grant’s office, while claiming to be working to protect children online, is now using that Act to defend twisted LGBTIQA+ activists who seek to groom children into their lifestyle and even assist children to undergo sex hormone treatment and mutilating sex-change surgery.
In a further Orwellian twist, Inman Grant’s office is now is running “a social campaign” around identifying “coercive control” in relationships even to the extent of defining in her words, “what love is and what it isn’t”. Oh do tell us Big Sister cyber goddess. We the unwashed masses knew nothing about such things before you arrived on the scene.