By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
DID Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel of the Sydney Assyrian Christian Church make himself an enemy of the compromised, deep state within the Australian corporate government? Or was he just the potential victim of another “lone nut” assassin.
Listening to his vast collection of online sermons, it soon becomes clear that this bishop could easily have made enemies on a number of fronts – the Australian and global medical interests who ran the c19 scamdemic, the Vatican and Pope Francis, the Freemasons, Islamists, Zionists, the LGBTQ lobby, child traffickers and even “the Round Table”.
All of those were targeted by the uncompromising messages shared online by the Assyrian Christian Bishop on YouTube, TikTok and other platforms worldwide. A large number of the Bishop’s hundreds of thousands of followers were young TikTok account holders.
We’re all well aware that the teenager who attacked the bishop appeared to be an Islamic zealot of some description, who was muttering Allah Akbar after being restrained by parishioners and telling them the reason he attacked the bishop was because he insulted his prophet.
But the bishop did the utmost Christian action after the attack. He got up and went to his attacker, put his hand on his head, prayed for him and told him he was forgiven. Fortunately for the bishop, the attacker’s flick-blade knife malfunctioned, because the ferocity and speed of the lunges could have easily been lethal.
A report that someone in the church cut off the attackers fingers was denied. Apparently when the blade did come out, it took off parts of the assailant’s own fingers.
There are other theories around possible motives for the attack. The bishop not only condemned the Islamic religion, he said, in diplomatic but certain terms that Pope Francis had “no jurisdiction” to offer his blessing to same-sex unions. Freemasons were also condemned for their Luciferian links and infiltration of institutions and Jews told to stop killing children in Gaza.
The Sydney Morning Herald, reflecting the political establishment, had this to say about the bishop: “Emmanuel is a prominent leader of an ultra-conservative sect of the Assyrian Orthodox. He became popular during the COVID-19 pandemic for being critical of lockdowns and vaccines.
“Often livestreaming his services on YouTube and social media where he has hundreds of thousands of followers, he preached fire and brimstone and drew in radical Christians for his anti-LGBTQ sermons.
“Other viral livestreams of his feature hardline views about American and Russian politics, as well as claiming Satan founded the United Nations. Speaking on Joe Biden’s US election win in one of his sermons posted to TikTok, Emmanuel said: “100 per cent it was rigged by the secret societies”.”
Could this bishop have been seen by the political establishment to be “radicalizing” young Australians and others? Were his messages a big part of the “toxic social media” that politicians and bureaucrats and academics and globalist NGOs have been railing against in recent years?
Not co-incidentally, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese seized upon this declared “terrorist attack” to triple the budget of the Office of the e-Safety Commissar, Julie Inman Grant, who on the Monday following the attack, issued notices compelling social media companies to remove offending material within 24 hours. Elon Musk refused but Zuckerberg’s slimy Meta crowd naturally complied, as they will censor material at the drop of a hat.
Inman Grant, as we previously reported, attended the 2023 World Economic Forum to take orders from Herr Schwab. Facebook and X were told to remove violent and distressing videos and imagery of the stabbing and had been issued with notices to remove material within 24 hours that depicted “gratuitous or offensive violence with a high degree of impact or detail”.
“While the majority of mainstream social media platforms have engaged with us, I am not satisfied enough is being done to protect Australians from this most extreme and gratuitous violent material circulating online,” Inman Grant said. “That is why I am exercising my powers under the Online Safety Act to formally compel them to remove it.”
Given that extreme and bloody violence is streamed into Australian homes on a daily basis from movie platforms like Netflix and Stan, the action is pure hypocrisy and clearly an exercise in government pushing its agenda to take control of social media.
But what is intriguing about this attack is how it so quickly dominated the Westfield Bondi Junction Shopping Centre knife attack on Saturday afternoon with its highly restricted and controlled media coverage.
The livestreamed attack on the bishop on Sunday night drew a sudden and angry community gathering of hundreds outside the church in Wakely. Then police arrived in their dozens and implemented riot control tactics on the crowd, some of whom were throwing bricks and jumping on police cars.
Could there have been some provocateurs injected into this crowd? Some local parishioners expressed their disgust at the behaviour, although it was obvious a number of hot heads were out for instant justice on whoever committed the attack and angry at police for using pepper spray.
The attacker himself was brought out by police and placed in a divvy van, protected by a line of police, whose behaviour was mostly hands-off and restrained until some stone and brick throwing resumed. TV clips showing violence were in fact only very brief moments.
Sydney freelance media channel operator Chriscoveries posted hours of video footage of the ruckus outside the church on his Facebook page, any spin on what happened can be clearly judged against this. In contrast, the Bondi attack, as with many other such attacks, featured about half a dozen edited and disjointed clips, repeated on media, leaving us guessing what happened next, for instance, the so-called Bollard Man on the escalator.
The police follow-up arrests of those involved in church disturbance was over the top, with heavily armed SOG squad rocking up at an address with a battering ram, as if the alleged rioter, who appeared peacefully, was some sort of dangerous drug runner. Another arrested man was not accused of rioting but rather “shouting vile religious insults at the bishop’s attacker” and threatening to kill him.
Meanwhile at the Bondi shopping centre during the week the atmosphere, by stark contrast, was sombre and very controlled with bouquets of flowers filling the street and then a specially constructed tent inside the mall building.
There was also a candlelight vigil at Bondi beach addressed by Albanese and NSW Premier Chris Mins. “What they all had in common was that they were making plans,” said Mins of the six victims. “They were hopeful, optimistic people. They were looking to the future with excitement, focused on tomorrow.”
Whether there was some connection between the two attacks we can’t yet say with any certainty, although Cairns News is investigating certain curious aspects of the Bondi incident, some of which we have already pointed out – for instance the complete lack of blood on the offender and those who supposedly gave assistance to those stabbed and the bizarre attempt at CPR by a police officer on a man lying on the floor.
The fact that these two dramatic knife attacks occurred on the same weekend, along with another in Melbourne, is also highly suspcious, given that Westfield Sydney staff were given leaflets a week or so before the attack on what to do if an armed offender appeared and that the bishop received a death threat that he had two weeks to live.