Online ‘child safety’ hypocrites threaten 780k fine for ‘misgendering’ porn-posting tranny – www.cairnsnews.org

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Billboard Chris (left) on his campaign for the protection of children and their parents from gender ideology.

By TONY MOBILIFONITIS
THE office of Australia’s so-called eSafety commissioner Julie Inman Grant, has ordered Elon Musk’s X platform to take down a post allegedly “misgendering” and “mocking the gender identity” of a trans-sexual man Teddy Cook.

It was posted by Canadian man Billboard Chris, who campaigns against child gender drugging and sexual mutiliation that is now officially backed by governments worldwide (including Australia) in cahoots with LGBTQ activists. Welcome to the Orwellian world of the global internet censorship commissariat defending the global LGBTQ+ revolutionary assault on traditional values, the family and childhood innocence.

Cook, originally a woman who now calls himself a non-binary activist, has been hired by the WHO to help a panel draft guidelines on “care for trans people”. The Daily Mail reported that Florence Ashley, another tranny with extreme views on medicating children with puberty blockers, has been sacked from the 21-member panel tasked with setting international treatment guidelines for treating gender dysphoria. Another transvestite panel member named Cianán Russell was also exposed over his posts on Grindr.

We can also predict that Australia’s eSafety office will prosecute other people who dare criticise these same LGBTQ activists behind the warped and diabolical practice of “gender transitioning” children.

Inman Grant’s office has threatened X and Billboard Chris with a fine of up to a maximum of $782,500 AUD if they do not comply. The unsigned notice attributed to a delegate for the eSafety Commissioner lays out in Orwellian language the alleged “crimes” of the post. It says “an ordinary reasonable person would conclude that it is likely that the Material is intended to cause serious harm to the Complainant.

“This is because the material Misgenders the Complainant and reiterates that this point is deliberate, which is likely intended to invalidate and mock the Complainant’s gender identity. The Material also contains a statement that implicitly equates transgender identity with a psychiatric condition.

“This statement is deliberately degrading and suggests that all transgender people – and in this case the complainant in particular – have something that is ‘wrong’ about their psychology owing to their gender identity.”

The Daily Mail reported that Cook advocated for taxpayer-funded surgeries for all trans Australians, and worked on a study about trans people having better sex when they’re high on drugs. “Cook’s social media posts are even more revealing. He’s posted about everything from public nudity to bondage parties, trans orgies and even a photo of a man apparently having sex with a dog.

“These revelations should not necessarily exclude Cook from work at the UN. But, for many, his antics are too smutty for a strait-laced intergovernmental body,” the newspaper reported.

The report also notes Cook posting “crude and inappropriate” social media material including photos of himself naked on beaches, with hands covering his privates, in bondage gear in nightclubs, or wearing t-shirts text such as ‘come in me bro’. Another post appeared to show a large, black dog penetrating a man from behind.

Cook also co-founded a “safe sex campaign” group called Grunt, which promotes ‘hot, informed sex between trans guys and cis guys’. The group published a booklet of photos of trans people wearing bondage gear in graphic sex scenes with multiple partners.

This week the smug and smiling corporate power lady Inman-Grant welcomed her fellow EU censorship czar Ylva Johansson to Australia on some sort of global junket promoting what Inman-Grant calls “our continued commitment against online child sexual exploitation and terrorist content”.

These people are dangerous, diabolical and totalitarian hypocrites of the highest order. On one hand they claim to be protecting childhood innocence, but on the other they are zealous in prosecuting people like Billboard Chris, who is fighting the LGBTQ+ assault on traditional Christian morality and children themselves.

These grossly overpaid activist bureaucrats in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the US, UK and Europe are operating under Acts of Parliament to control, censor and punish online speech deemed not only threatening, but merely “hateful”.

Canada is even proposing life imprisonment for people who advocate genocide under its “Online Harms Bill”. The previous penalty was five years. So-called hate speech is also being lumped in with child pornography, as if there is some sort of moral equivalence.

Canada’s Bill C-63 seeks to force social-media, user-uploaded adult content and live-streaming platforms to reduce exposure to content deemed harmful, to strengthen reporting of child pornography and “better address hate propaganda and provide recourse to victims of hate online”.

Canada’s National Post reports it also amends the Criminal Code to create a new “hate crime” offence designed “to deter hateful conduct”, as well as raising the maximum punishments for “hate propaganda offences” from five years to life imprisonment for advocating genocide.

Those pushing this legislation are the same shrill voices who will endorse a transgender freak grooming a child in a library, reading books about gender and sex, or activists pushing into school curricula books with graphic details of various sexual activities indulged in across the range of LGBTQ variants. How far removed is that from child pornography?

And should we mention their diabolical gender clinics and drugging and mutilation of children, even behind the backs of their own parents? Oh no, it’s misogyny and hate speech they’re after folks and to express hatred of this government-LGBTQ child abuse scandal could land you with a commissar’s notice for “hate speech”.

Now consider for a moment, a member of some Middle Eastern ethnic group that has suffered genocidal attacks by an outside nation state or other ethnic group. This person expresses hatred for them and posts on social media “the xyzs are all scum and they deserve to die”.

Such a comment would probably be dismissed for what it is – just someone expressing hatred. Hatred simply means intense dislike and that has never been a crime in common law. However if that hatred becomes a specific plan or threat to harm or kill others, it does become a crime and that person might well be investigated by police or a security agency.

But should people be hauled before some tribunal headed by some commissar and be jailed for merely expressing hate? Absolutely not. That is violation of free speech and thought. But “wrongthink” is exactly what the globalist NGOs are targeting in cahoots with governments who will pass the censorship laws they write, allegedly “for your protection”. Australia’s own eSafety Commissioner has already demonstrated this.

What the globalist NGOs, such as the Germany-based Digital Policy Lab (DPL) are really targeting is speech and content that challenges globalist political agendas, for instance the DPL’s paper Misogynistic Pathways to Radicalisation (promoted by Jacinda Ardern’s online censorship NGO Christchurch Call) states: “The Digital Policy Lab (DPL) is an inter-governmental working group focused on charting the policy path forward to prevent and counter the spread of disinformation, hate speech, extremist and terrorist content online.”

“Disinformation” and “hate speech” are highly subjective terms, but clearly the globalists have become alarmed by online opposition to their programs promoting LGBTQ ideology, mass, uncontrolled immigration aka “white replacement”, and control of property and resources under fake environmental narratives – basically their Diversity, Equity and Inclusivity (DEI) global program they have forced on the corporate sector.

DPL describes itself as “an inter-governmental working group focused on charting the policy path forward to prevent and counter the spread of disinformation, hate speech, extremist and terrorist content online. It comprises representatives of relevant ministries and regulatory bodies from liberal democracies.”

That statement alone tells you what this “eSafety” campaign is: A globally co-ordinated assault on online content deemed dangerous by the states and various ideologically-driven special interest groups invested in the global agenda.

The Orwellian double speak is not difficult to decipher: “The DPL aims to foster inter-governmental exchange, provide policymakers and regulators with access to sector-leading expertise and research, and build an international community of practice around key challenges in the digital policy space.”

The paper goes on to explain how the DPL, through the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) organised working group meetings on the topic of online gender-based violence between May and June 2023.

The working group comprised DPL members representing national ministries and regulators from Australia, Canada, Germany, New Zealand, the UK, and the US. Members of the Global Partnership for Action on Gender-Based Online Harassment and Abuse (Global Partnership) and the hristchurch Call’s multi-stakeholder Community joined the working group and contributed to this paper.”

Cairns News would politely suggest that these gaggles of femocrats, bureaucrats, LGBTQ activists and various corporate hangers-on go out and get real jobs and do something productive.



Source link