By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
“ROYAL Family fans have been shocked to learn King Charles III is related to Dracula,” Ethan Blackshaw of the UK Express wrote in June 2024.
“Both Charles and his mother, the late Queen Elizabeth II, can trace their ancestry back to Vlad the Impaler (Vlad III), a 15th-century Romanian prince infamous for his brutal method of impaling enemies on stakes,” the Express reported.
“Vlad III was also known as Vlad Dracula, being the illegitimate son of Vlad II Dracul. ‘Dracul’ translates to ‘the Dragon’, a title Vlad II earned due to his membership in the Order of the Dragon. ‘Dracula’ signifies ‘son of Dracul’.
“The character of Dracula from Bram Stoker’s novel, published in 1897, is believed by some to have been inspired by Vlad III. However, historians suggest that Stoker merely borrowed the name and based the character more on the blood-sucking vampires found in Romanian folklore.”
The Express goes on to note that Romania’s tourist business is well aware that Charles is the great-grandson 16 times removed of Vlad III, through Queen Mary, the consort of George V. “Charles himself has acknowledged this connection in the past and even visited the Carpathian Mountains in Romania for a TV show in 2011. He also purchased and renovated a farmhouse in Transylvania in 2006.
“Charles has engaged in charity work in the region and mentioned having a “bit of a stake in the country” (chuckle, chuckle) due to his family ties. In 2017, he was invited by the mayor of the city of Alba Iulia to accept the honorary title of Prince of Transylvania.
“A recent post on X/Twitter highlighting the link between Charles and Vlad the Impaler has garnered 70,000 likes, with many fans of the Royal Family expressing surprise at this revelation.” And that is where The Express ends its story.
King Charles also has another interesting connection – to the late BBC pop-show host and pedophile Jimmy Saville. The connection, as noted by Alex Jones, was very close and in parallel with Stoker’s horror novel Dracula. “Charles is Dracula and Jimmy Saville is Renfield (Dracula’s deranged but loyal offsider),” says Jones.
Is that too much of a stretch, an overly-tenuous connection? Surely our oh-so jolly gentleman King Charles wouldn’t stoop to the level of the man who he just happened to call his “best friend”? Now of course, we know royals like Prince Andrew sometimes get caught playing up, but Charles? Unthinkable? Did the late Princess Diana know too much?
Jones says Saville’s pedophilia often occurred at the hospitals he “supported” with “charitable donations”. Wards would be sealed off and the despicable acts including rape and torture would occur, and the child victim murdered or left to die but then mourned as a tragic passing.
“Bram Stoker’s horror novel is an allegory of stuff that was really going on in Europe and England at the time, and you’ve got Renfield that’s a familiar to Dracula, meaning that he’s bidding but not fully transforming into a vampire. He’s a slave, a daywalker. And what does Renfield want? He begs Dracula, can I have some bugs to eat, can I have some rats,” he says.
Dracula says yes, then in his evil, most sinister manner, suggests Renfield actually needs to eat a child. “But the archtype of Dracula is who we’re talking about,” says Jones.
“So if you want to know who we are up against, we’re up against Count Dracula…then you learn about King Charles and he is Dracula, he is full-on Dracula and his famous Renfield is Jimmy Saville and they admit that he (Saville) had torture dungeons and dead kids.” Jones does not see it coincidental that an official portrait of Charles is done almost entirely in blood red, “with demons in the background”. “They are even telling you who they are.”
Jones further claims that it’s no coincidence that Charles lives in the Transylvania region of Romania for up to six months of the year and that he runs a charity there “looking after children”. Charles’ “special relationship” with Romania has been reported in mainstream media.
It’s an incredibly horrific thought to think that the King of the British Commonwealth of Nations is somehow involved in criminal child abuse and exploitation. Perhaps Alex Jones really is just an evil, deranged conspiracy nut and Charles’ close association with Jimmy Saville was “just unfortunate” and he genuinely is looking after orphans in Romania. Many would like to think that, but the story doesn’t end there.
British MP Andrew Bridgen has appeared in an interview with Jones accusing British intelligence agencies of covering up the international child trafficking trade. “We now know there is more money involved in illegal child trafficking than there is in drugs,” Bridgen said.
“It appears there are far fewer convictions, and ultimately I think it’s the glue that holds the self-proclaimed elites around the world together because once they’re involved in pedophilia or profiting from child trafficking it’s the ultimate blackmail, there’s no way out of the club for them. They all have to go down together and that’s what’s going on.”
This is not news to Cairns News followers nor anyone else who has followed alternative internet media over the past few decades. An online US-UK website collaboration called Abel Danger dug deep into this issue and the 9-11 attacks some years ago.
Bridgen, of course, was involved in the fight in the British Parliament to expose the Covid scamdemic and mRNA vaccine dangers. He was dumped by his own Conservative Party and sidelined, joining the Reclaim Party for seven months. Now the UK Parliament is in uproar over the mass child rape scandal involving mostly Pakistani Moslem gangs.
Bridgen, speaking on Resistance GB, said he had passed details and names of people running child trafficking operations into the UK, but had been ignored. He said the traffickers were flying “hundreds and hundreds and hundreds” of children into small UK airports that haven’t got fences around them.
“I gave the government names of the people, the name of the company they were laundering the money through, where the children were being taken to have their photograph taken – they thought they were going to schools – these (photographs) were for selling them to pedophiles. It’s gone to MI5, it’s gone to the National Crime Agency – nothing, nobody will act. And then when you see the names you see why.”